Nasdaq NFLX NetFlix

Report: Disney+ Sees Spike in Demand, Beating Rivals

5 years 5 months ago
Disney (NYSE: DIS) has been under severe pressure during the COVID-19 crisis with its theme parks on lockdown and movie theaters across the country closed. But the launch of its new streaming service couldn't have come at a better time, with schools closed and parents working fr
The Motley Fool

Will Coronavirus Be the Last Act for Movie Theaters?

5 years 5 months ago
A lot has changed in recent months since I called the dividend of AMC Entertainment (NYSE: AMC) a relatively safe bet. Not only has that dividend payout since been slashed, but it's looking increasingly likely there will be no future dividends at all. AMC CEO Adam Aron said in a
The Motley Fool

Popeyes Sharing Netflix Login Data During Pandemic

5 years 5 months ago
Capitalizing on consumers being forced to stay indoors with little to do except watch TV and eat during the coronavirus pandemic, Restaurant Brands International's (NYSE: QSR) Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen launched a marketing campaign to share its Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) account det
The Motley Fool

Netflix vs. Roku: Which Streaming Stock Is the Better Buy? 5-Star Analyst Answers

5 years 5 months ago

While the coronavirus’ impact on the market has meant, in most cases, a complete meltdown of companies’ value, there have been a number of outliers among the decimated names. Typically, these are the companies that offer the public and investors alike a product or service needed in such times. While no one would argue streaming is as important as a vaccine, some companies providing services in this field have held steady against the overall market’s decline.

Netflix (NFLX), for example. Against the run of play, the streaming giant is up by 10% year-to-date, bolstered by a narrative which suggests more people staying at home equates to more revenue.

But 5-star Needham analyst Laura Martin has been arguing the case against Netflix for a while now and the streaming leader’s durability in such difficult times hasn’t changed her mind. In fact, the analyst rates Netflix shares an Underperform (i.e. Sell). (To watch Martin’s track record, click here)

Martin laid out her case, noting, “We worry about NFLX's balance sheet and potential liquidity woes based on our projection of $2-4B of negative FCF in 2020, coupled with high-yield bond market volatility. Additionally, Antenna data through March 1, 2020 show that NFLX's US net sub adds have been negative for most of the past 12 months, due to price increases and new SVOD competition.”

Instead, martin suggests investors take a look at the streaming universe’s new player, Roku (ROKU). The alternative choice is an interesting one, as lately the phrase “the new Netflix” has been thrown about whenever Roku is in the vicinity.

Unlike Netflix, though, Roku hasn’t been immune to the virus’s impact. Following last year’s run, in which its share price skyrocketed by almost 350%, at the turn of the year, Roku stock was already showing signs of fatigue. Over the last month, alongside the rest of the market, the share price has shed 27% of its value. So, what makes Roku preferable to Netflix, according to Martin?

First of all, Martin argues, Roku should be viewed as an “aggregation platform, similar to iOS and Android in mobile and Facebook in social.” Following up this bold assertion with the claim, “Winning aggregators typically benefit from winner-take-most economics.” No prizes for guessing who Martin thinks the winner here will be.

The analyst also counts a number of reasons why Roku is her streaming player of choice among the two. These include a more favorable valuation, alongside relative balance sheet strength. Additionally, Roku’s role as an aggregator platform provides it with relative pricing power and a preferable competitive position. Martin also adds, that in contrast to Netflix’s fixed monthly fee, Roku’s revenue is tied to viewing growth, with advertising as its primary source of income.

Martin concludes, “Although hours streamed are growing during COVID-19, we prefer Roku, which has a volume-based revenue model (ie, advertising CPMs) based on viewing time rather than NFLX, which charges the same price regardless of hours viewed. Additionally, Nielsen reports 88mm US connected-TV homes with at least one SVOD service. Since NFLX has 61mm paying US subs (ie, 70% of 88mm), we prefer Roku, which has an installed base of 37mm US homes, suggesting more upside potential.”

Martin, therefore, reiterates a Buy rating on Roku, along with a price target of $200. This conveys the analyst’s confidence in Roku surging by an extra 123% in the next twelve months.

So, where does the Street stand on the two streaming players?

Netflix gets a Moderate Buy rating from the analyst consensus, based on 23 Buys, 6 Holds and 3 Sells. Shares in NFLX sell for $357.32, and the $382.90 average price target suggests a modest 7% upside potential. (See Netflix stock analysis on TipRanks)

As for Roku - 5 Buys, 3 Holds and 2 Sells, also add up to a Moderate Buy consensus rating. At $139.40, the Street sees further upside of 43%. Overall, Roku is clearly the winner here. (See Roku stock analysis on TipRanks)

To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.

TipRanks
Checked
3 hours 19 minutes ago
This feed is responsible for generating the rss feed related to the topic NFLX
Subscribe to Nasdaq NFLX NetFlix feed