At the National Prayer Breakfast last week, President Trump promised to “totally destroy” the so-called “Johnson Amendment,” a law that prohibits churches from endorsing or opposing political candidates at the risk of losing their tax-exempt status.
A fierce legal battle is brewing over President Donald Trump's extreme vetting executive order as the radical alt-left continues its willingness to gamble with the lives of Americans.
Continuing their behavior as aggrieved sore losers without any actual grievances other than they lost, the so called “Women’s March” has announced a general strike.
Betsy DeVos, a woman who has devoted much of her life to improving our country’s broken schools has been deemed by Democrats (and two Republicans) as unworthy to head the Department of Education. Why this resistance?
It’s too bad the Super Bowl’s advertisers did not follow Lady Gaga’s example and stay away from politics. A number of companies decided to play politics with their high-profile and high-dollar advertisements.
The strategists inside Hillary Clinton’s Brooklyn campaign headquarters believed that demography was destiny and that a mythical ascendant majority of African-Americans, Hispanics, single women and millennials would elect their boss president of the United States.
The NFL is a business, whether it’s negotiating player contracts, televising games or hosting the Super Bowl. And that is something that should be kept in mind, from host cities to fans.
I have long held that no nominee’s résumé alone—no matter how sterling—should be considered sufficient to merit confirmation to the Supreme Court. Rather, we must also consider a nominee’s judicial philosophy.