If Mitch McConnell presses forward in ramming through a Supreme Court nominee in the next few weeks, the work of Justice Ginsburg and the rights of millions of Americans will be at risk with a 6-3 conservative majority on the high court.
Extremism is in at CNN — a symptom of cognitive failure. For to hold such extreme notions, you must embrace the irrational. As for real problems? Just deny.
By telling Senate Republicans Saturday they have an obligation to fill “without delay” the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, President Trump sets in motion a process that could dominate the remaining weeks of the presidential election.
While no one could ever fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's liberal shoes, her replacement could launch constitutional law in an equally opposite, conservative direction for a generation.
If the Left can unilaterally impeach and try to remove a president during an election year, a Supreme Court justice can certainly be appointed during an election year.
Many people wonder how Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and my father, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, managed to be such good friends despite holding such different ideological views.
Friday’s death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman on the U.S. Supreme Court and a trailblazer of enormous legal and gender advancements, promises to dramatically alter not only the dynamics of this year’s presidential campaign, but also the direction of the high court and nation for generations.